Friday 31 October 2014

Presentation of life and death in "The Old Man and the Sea"


 “A man can be destroyed but not defeated”.

Ernest Hemingway



                Life is always about struggle, hurdles and problems and finally it ends with achievements. “The Old Man and the Sea” novel also talks about struggle of life and about achievements. The darkness we face in our tough time but still we fight for victory that thing is showed in this novel.
                “The Old Man and the sea” is a novel written by Ernest Hemingway. He was an American author. The novel was written in 1951 at Cuba and it was published in 1952. Ernest Miller Hemingway was born on 21st July, 1899 at Oak Park, United States. He had produced most of his work between the mid 1920s and the mid 1950s. He published seven novels, six short story collections and two non- fiction work. Many of his work are considered classics of American Literature. His first novel was “The Sun also rises”, which was published in 1926.
                After the publication of “The Old Man and the Sea” Hemingway became an international celebrity. He won Pulitzer Prize in May, 1952. In October 1954, Hemingway received Noble Prize in literature. In 1961, he bought a house in Ketchum, Idaho and he committed suicide. Hemingway’s family and friends flew to Ketchum for the funeral which was done by the local Catholic priest, who believed the death accidental.
                Thus, a person himself was an inspiration for other and he ends up his own life.

Presentation of Life in “The Old Man and the Sea”:

                “The Old Man and the Sea” mainly focus on the idea of life and death. This novel clearly shows that how an old man defeat his failure. The presentations of positive ideas are well portrayed in this novel. The presentation of life is the sprite which old man shows for those eighty-seven days. If we have to look at the presentation of life then we can say that the character that survived and defeat their failure is the real life.

Santiago as a life in the novel:


                

“A man can be destroyed but not defeated”

                
The line mentioned above is truly defining the character of Santiago. Santiago was an old man. Through out of his life he struggled a lot. Well, he was an experienced fisherman. He was living in a village near Cuban. He was unable to catch the fish for eighty four days. So he became laughing stock of his village. As he was old man, he was also fighting for his existence also.
               

                “Perhaps I should not have been a fisherman.”
                “But that was the thing that I was born for.”

               
                Santiago had committed to himself that he would become a great fisherman and he decided that he would catch biggest fish of the sea. This shows how he challenged himself to become achiever and not to become a failed one. When Marlin was destroyed by sharks, Santiago was broken down. He was fighting with those sharks since last three days but he didn’t lose his pride. He thinks a lot and went to the villagers and become happy. Santiago was able to secure his life and he was also sure that he will never have to endure such an epic struggle again.
                Santiago’s philosophy and his inner power make him different from the other villagers. Santiago’s dedication to his craft separates him from the primitive fisherman motivated by money.
                The way Hemingway used to think about life, the same thing he portrayed in the character of Santiago. Santiago fights against death until he could and finally he didn’t destruct. He remains dedicated to a profession he sees as a more spiritual way of life and a part of nature’s order in the eternal cycle that makes all creatures brothers in their common condition of both predator and prey.
                Santiago’s life was not easy but still he had enough fighting spirit that leads him towards his destiny. He was an old by number not his eyes or his vision to achieve. The only thing makes him different from other was his way of work, philosophy. In his old age also he was having strength to prove his self. He was still young, cheerful and undefeated. He was having best tools to win over the life and they are like Hardship, Hope, Dreams, Faith and Absorption.
               

                “I remember everything from when we first went together.”
                The old man looked at him with his sun- burned confident loving eyes.
                -The old man and the sea


Manolin as a life in “The Old Man and the Sea”:

               
                Manolin was living with Santiago since the age of five. Manolin’s life roams around Santiago all the time. He always used to ask about everything. He cares a lot. He makes sure that Santiago has food, blankets and can rest without being bothered. These shows that one can forgetting his own needs can take care for someone else life. He used to show so much concern about Santiago. His dedication to learning from the old man ensures that Santiago will live on. Manolin had proved that he never feel inferior with Santiago and Santiago also shown care like father to him. These proved that how lively relation they have!!!

Presentation of death in “The Old Man and the Sea”:


                “The Old Man and the Sea” novel is all about life and the spirit to live the life. The way Santiago presents himself that shows that there is no age limit or any other boundaries if we really want to achieve something in life.

“You did not kill the fish only to keep alive and to sell for food, he thought. You killed him for pride and because you loved him after. If you love him it is not a sin to kill him. Or is it more?”

                These lines symbolically speak a lot about death. Marlin was the fish who was killed by Santiago but before that on eighty fifth day when Santiago go further in the sea to catch a big fish, he caught Marlin. Marlin was so long and big fish. Marlin was that much heavy weighted that at one point reader started thinking that Marlin would be able to free from Santiago’s hand. Santiago and Marlin both were struggling for their life at that time.

                The spirit which Santiago got was tremendous. He was not having fear of death but he had enough strength to fight against failure. The way he fought for life shows that death was not acceptable at all by him. At the end of the novel also, he didn’t die. He back to his bed and again started dreaming of lion. That shows that novel was open ended. Hemingway didn’t portray any particular death in this novel. So the death of Marlin was the victory of Santiago. Thus, Hemingway’s style of portraying of life and death was inspirational for the reader which gives strength to the people to face the problem and come out of that and that will be true life.
               

               
                 

Research in Sociolinguistics



Language is very important and basic tool that we used to communicate. The importance of language is essential to every aspects and interaction in our everyday lives. We use language to inform the people around us. We communicate effectively with our words, gestures and tones of voice in a multitude of situation. Being able to communicate with each other form bonds teamwork and it’s what separates humans from other animal species. Communication derives our lives and betters us.


What is Sociolinguistics?
                
Sociolinguistics basically made up of two different words.

                
          Society + Linguistics = Sociolinguistics.

                

Basically society is made up of people and they used language for communication. So sociolinguistics does the study of the relationship between language and society. Importantly it examines how language operates within and creates social structures. It is also the descriptive study of the all aspects of society, cultural norms, expectations and context, on the way language is used and the effects of language use on society. Every person has their own way of speaking language. Studies in sociolinguistics explore the things like we can easily differentiate the person by his or her speech. It is also helpful to find out whether person is from our community or not.
                Sociolinguistics mainly does studies on speech communities based on social categories like age, class, ethnicity, gender, geography profession and sexual identity.
It is also help us to understand why we speak differently in various social contexts and help uncover the social relationship in a community.
Example: The way of interaction with your friend, family, teachers, and strangers will be different from each other.
                Thus, sociolinguistics exists everywhere because our tone always used to get changed person to person.
                The study of sociolinguistics made between two, like:

1. Micro Sociolinguistics
2. Macro Sociolinguistics


Micro Sociolinguistics:
                
Micro sociolinguistics is a kind of a study which mainly focuses on the dialect and stylistic variation. Every person has different dialect and has his or her own style for language. It’s also do study of speaking style of people. Micro sociolinguistics refers to research with a linguistic slant often focusing on dialect and stylistic variation. Both quantitive and qualitative research methods have been employed to explore such linguistic phenomena as phonological differences between dialects or discourse variation between male and female speaker.

Macro sociolinguistics:

                Macro sociolinguistics works on higher level. It studies on not only dialects and styles but it works on behaviours of entire speech community or society. There are so many languages which are speaking by only particular community people, but the same language is not understood by other community people. It also studies the issues like why immigrant communities retain their native language in some society, social context but not in others or how social identity can affect language choice.

Research on Sociolinguistics:

                Sociolinguistics is the study which can explored in many way. There are so many things which are still having discussed in sociolinguistics. If we explores some of those aspects of sociolinguistics research that have been particularly productive when viewed through the lens of L2 teaching and learning. These works will be discussed within three categories:

  • Language Variation
  • Linguistics relativity
  • Language in Contact


Language variations in Sociolinguistics

                

In sociolinguistics, language variation includes languages, dialects, accents, registers, styles or other sociolinguistics variation also called as “Lect”. By using language variation we can avoid misinterpretation “variety” avoids the term language, which many people associate only with the standard language and dialect which is associate with non- standard varieties thought of as less prestigious or “correct” than the standard linguistics speaks of standard and non- standard varieties.
                Freeman and McElhinny, legendry sociolinguistics had done survey on the interaction of culture and gender with respect to politeness. They found that according to society, “In societies where politeness is normative valued or seen as a skill or where acquisition of politeness is not an automatic part of language learning but requires additional training, men tend to be understood as more polite, and women are understood as impolite or too polite. In societies where directness is valued and politeness is seen as a form of deference rather than a skill women tend to be more polite or at least are perceived as a more polite……..
                Thus, they found that it is a kind of ideology rather than use of language. Thus language variation has its own impact on societies which can be found through different researches.

Linguistic Relativity:

                Linguistic relativity can be viewed in many ways. When people from different communities or class misunderstood the common linguistic behaviour that creates problem with the speaker and they trapped into miscommunication. Research had study on cross-cultural miscommunication and they found that the same language speaker also faced the problem of miscommunication and their language can interpret in different way. This miscommunication of language can be called as Pragmalinguistics and Socio-pragmatics failure.

Communicative Competence:

                “Communicative competence”, term coined by Dell Hymes in 1966. Communicative Competence actually means that a language which speaker used is grammatically correct like the user have the knowledge of some basic things like syntax; morphology, phonology and a speaker have also knowledge of when to use proper utterance appropriately.
                Cross linguistic communication also says that speaker with the only knowledge of grammar may be failed in communication but a speaker should also have the knowledge of current communicative aspects. Speaker must be aware of all these things. Thus, social relativity somehow focused on grammar and also on social aspects of language use.

Languages in Contact:

                A speaker or a learner from L1 lives in a variety of environment can get many alternatives to monolinguals. In dialogic situation, varieties of two languages are exists side by side. The first language is used in formal situation like corporate education. Another language is used in informal situation. The first and the other is the local, native language, which considered as a low language.
 
Code-switching is another contact in which a bilingual speakers switch from one language to another at a time and with the same utterance. It is quite easy for bilingual speakers.
                Thus, sociolinguistic is a study of language used in social world. It is very necessary for a speaker to know all the aspects of sociolinguistics.










A Tempest: A Post-Colonial Text.



"Call me X. That would be best. Like a man without a name, or to be more precise, a man whose name has been stolen. You talk about history� well, that's history, and everyone knows it! Every time you call me it reminds me of a basic fact, the fact that you've stolen everything from me, even my identity! Uhuru!"


What is Post-Colonial Literature?

                Post colonial literature is a kind of writing which affected by the moment of colonization. Europe was colonizer in Asia, Africa, Middle East and many other countries. Post-Colonial literature deals with the problems of colonized nation especially the problem happened with act, culture and literature. If we talk about India, India was also very much affected through European colonizer. The post colonial literature also includes post colonial critiques of and about post colonial literature, the undertones of which carry communicate and justify racism and colonialism.
                Colonial writing is very much different from postcolonial literature. Somehow, post colonial literature is also focusing on world literature rather than British literature. Post colonial literature reflects the changing nature of British society, which became multi cultural place. Thus, Post colonial literature put light on literature written after independence and focusing on world literature.

A Tempest:

                
A Tempest is a play by Aime Cesaire written during 1969. It is an adaption of Shakespeare’s “The Tempest”. A Tempest is written in the context of post colonial literature. If we look at the small summary of “A Tempest” than we can found that it is very much near to Shakespeare’s “The Tempest. Aime Cesaire doesn’t make any major changes in “A Tempest”. All the characters are majorly portrays as it is, but as we know “A Tempest” is an example of post colonial literature, Aime Cesaire has focused on three main characters, through which he wants to give his message. They are:

Prospero: A White Master
Ariel: A Mulatto
Caliban: A Black Slave


  •  Ariel as a Mulatto:


     A mulatto is a kind of a person who has both Negro and European ancestry. The politically correct term for a person of a mixed race today is “biracial”.
                Mulatto also can be known as a person with half black and half white. These people in time of colonialism were dreamed to having white skin as they were the ruler (white men).
                If we see in the context of Ariel as a mulatto, he was also treated as a slave by Prospero. Prospero was a colonizer so he doesn’t care about people who are ill-treated by him. There is a time in the text which shows that how Prospero used to treat Ariel.


Ariel: Master, I must beg you to spare this kind of labour.
          Prospero: Listen, and listen well! There’s a talk to be                     performed and I don’t care how it gets done!
Ariel: You have promised me my freedom a thousand times and I           am still waiting.


                As Ariel was mulatto, he has desire to become a white but it is unfulfilled desire which never ends. Ariel always wanted to become free but his biological appearance and psychological state never make him free. His desire to become white is always driving him with Prospero. In hope that one day he become free from all this but at the end he doesn’t get anything. There is also one dialogue which shows how colonizer’s and mulatto’s mind works.

Ariel: Sometimes I almost regret it, after all, I might have                      turned into a real tree in the end…
Prospero: Stuff it! I don’t like talking trees. As for your                                 freedom, you’ll have it when I’m good and ready.

               
                This dialogue shows how colonizers mind works. As colonizer was in the power position, slave always stays mute. Their unfulfilled desires always stay silent. Ariel was obeying all the orders of Prospero but still he was unable to find his way or respect or desires. Ariel just has hope that one day he will get his function.
                Ariel, at the end couldn’t able to get his freedom and he was in illusion that he will get freedom.

Caliban as a black slave:


                Caliban was also working as a slave under colonizer Prospero. He was portrayed as a black slave in Aime Cesaire’s “A Tempest”. Caliban was the slave who was totally black. The biological structure of caliban was weird. The native of Caliban was most probably Africa and India.
                Caliban in “A Tempest” was portrayed as a black slave but as it falls under post colonial literature, Aime Cesaire had done some changes in the very beginning of the play. Caliban used his native language, which was forbidden to Prospero.

Caliban: Uhuru!
Prospero: What did you say?
Caliban: I said, Uhuru!
Prospero: Mumbling, your native language again! I’ve already                      told you, I don’t like it. You could be polite at least; a                    simple “hello” wouldn’t kill you.


“UHURU”: freedom.
                 -A Swahili word.
                -Swahili= a member of a Banta people of Zanzibar and the neighbouring coast of Africa.

                Caliban was many times raising his voice against Prospero, which shows that how Caliban fight against colonizer. It was not physical but it was verbal. He many times used his ideas to make Prospero realize that he had strength to fight against colonialism. In one conversation,


 Prospero: What would you be without me?
Caliban: Without you? I’d be the king, that’s what I’d be the king                of the Island. Island was given me by my mother,                            Sycorax.


                In this we found that Caliban had desired to be king but it was not fulfilled. Caliban wanted to defeat Prospero but it was next to impossible for him but still he didn't lose his hope.
                In scene 5, when Prospero sends all the lieutenants off the island, at the end Prospero and Caliban only left on island that can be seen as a fight of colonizer and colonized. The conversation of Prospero and Caliban is very much important during whole play.


Prospero: Come here, Caliban. Have you got anything to say in                       your own defence? Take advantage of my good                              humour. I’m in a forgiving mood today.

Caliban: I’m not interested in defending myself. My only regret is                 that, I've failed.

Prospero: What were you hoping for?

Caliban: First of all, I’d get rid of you. I’d spit you out all your                     works and pomp’s, your “white Magic!”


                This conversation was totally about what Caliban actually wants. Caliban was failed that he couldn't get freedom but that shows that he would still fight. He was no more became slave. He revolted against colonialism and that was the raise of post colonialism. There is one another conversation which defined that revolt very clearly.


Caliban: You know very well that I’m not interested in peace. I’m                 interested in being free! Free you hear?

Prospero: It’s odd…. No matter what you do, you won’t succeed                    in making me believe that I’m tyrant.


                Caliban at the end sung a song which stays alive when Caliban and Prospero left the stage but that song was still there.

Caliban: FREEDOM HI-DAY!  FREEDOM HI-DAY!


                “A Tempest” was answer to those questions which were raised during colonialism. It was about mulatto and black slave, which were treated like more than slave and then REVOLT become necessary.
                If Caliban did the same as Ariel than everything became normal and for the life time they became slave and freedom became illusion for them but Caliban had that strength that can fight against colonizer and his song was proof of that he was not died at all.
                Thus, Aime Cesaire had successfully portrayed all the issues which were needed in post colonial literature.  

 

Critical Scenes in Harold Pinter's "The Birthday Party"



“I never think of myself as wise,I think myself as possessing,A critical intelligence which I,Intend to allow operating.”-Harold Pinter

                Harold Pinter, the name itself says so many things. He was English playwright, screenwriter, director and actor. He was born on 10th October, 1930 at Hackney, East London, England. He was a sprinter and a cricket player, acting in school, plays and writing poetry. Pinter’s first play was “The Room” which he wrote in 1957. His second play was “The Birthday Party”. These two play falls under the category of comedy of menace. His two another play “No Man’s Land” and “Betrayal” became known as memory plays.                He was rewarded with so many awards like “Companion of Honour (2002), Noble Prize in literature (2005), David Cohen Prize (1995), Lawrence Olivier Award (1996) for his dedication for literature.

“The Companion of Honour I regarded,As an award from the countryFrom 50 years of work- which IThought was OKAY”-Harold Pinter

                It is not at all easy to speak in front of the people who are honouring you but that needs powerful personality and knowledge to speak like this. He received over 50 awards, prizes and many other honours. He was also appeared as an actor in productions of his own work on radio and film. He also undertook a number of roles in works by other writers. He directed nearly 50 productions for stage theatre and screen.

The Birthday Party:

                “There are no hard distinctions
                Between what is real and
                What is unreal, nor between
                What is true and what is false.
                A thing is not necessarily either true or
                False; it can be both true and false.”
                -Harold Pinter        
                          

                “The Birthday Party” is a play which falls under the category of absurd theater and comedy of menace. The play includes such features as the fluidity and ambiguity of time, place and identity and the disintegration of language. There are nearly six characters in the play.1.       Petey Boles – Chair attendant2.       Meg Boles -  Petey’s wife3.        Stanley Webber – A pianist4.       Lulu – Meg’s neighbor5.       Nat Goldberg – A Jew6.       McCann – A stranger comes with Nat


Critical Scenes in “The Birthday Party”:

        “The Birthday Party” is a play which has deep political meaning, interpretations. There are some scenes which has its own meaning which speaks about so many issues. I would like to discuss some of the scenes from the play “The Birthday Party”.


Interrogation Scene:

        “The Birthday Party” itself struggles with so many questions. The play left so many questions in viewer’s mind. There are few scenes which can critically read. One of the major scenes was Interrogation scene.        The scene began with McCann. He was methodically tears Petey’s newspaper into strips. The tearing of newspaper can also be read as symbolically. As McCann was not came out clearly during the whole play. His character is quite unpredictable. Newspaper is the medium of communication or knowledge but McCann was tearing it methodically. That shows that he had some inner fear from outer world. As he was in doubt during the whole play even he was not sure about his work also. Tearing of newspaper can be read as cut down the communication with the outer world and he was living in Petey’s house so that aloof from world and that gives him security.        As he was tearing newspaper, Stanley and McCann had a small conversation about his birthday party. After that Stanley tries to leave from there but McCann block his path. Stanley pick up a paper strip and that makes McCann angry. McCann start intimidating Stanley and then Stanley start speaking about his plans to return home. McCann finds that Stanley became frantic and he became flabbergasted by Stanley’s behavior That shows that Stanley always lives in fear that someone will come and caught him. When McCann and Petey exit, Stanley tries to convince Goldberg to pack up and leave but Goldberg simply talks about celebrating life and some other things. Then McCann re-enters and he and Goldberg order him to sit down but Stanley refuses and this goes on and finally McCann make him to sit by physical harm. Then they both start questioning in rapid-fire way. That was quite weird and irrelevant. The language which they were using was nonsensical and meaningless. Stanley was unable to speak a single word. That scene was a kind of torture. We were unable to get things from it. The scene also left so many questions in our mind.        The political reading of the scene can be write that power is most probably dominating and that makes us to think that why they target Stanley in such a way that he fall down and became speechless. Stanley was became the puppet of Goldberg and McCann hand. This was humiliation which made by powerful country for the smaller countries. Then Stanley stands up and when Meg enters to the room and then everything became normal.        The interpretation of the scene itself gives so many interpretations. Stanley was a conditioned by both of them and Goldberg and McCann were those people who had evil mind. They had wear the mask in front of the people but they were the god of devil behind that white skin, who have power to harm any people whether they can take person’s life also but when they come into the light they again wear mask of gentleman.


The Climax Scene:

        The climax scene more speaks about conflict of identities. It reveals so many things which were unspoken. Here we can found that Goldberg and McCann’s conversation, which make us to think about the identity question of Goldberg and McCann. McCann calls Goldberg by other name and Goldberg got angry upon McCann. That indicates that whether they are angel or evil.
        When Lulu left the room McCann goes off and returns with Stanley. This time Stanley was totally in different personality. He was dressed in a suit and clean, collared shirt, but that was just physical appearance. Mentally, Stanley was lost. The vision which brakes by McCann on his birthday party was totally broke him as a person. He was not able to speak a single word at all. He was just became puppet of Goldberg and McCann’s prank. His personality’s remote control was with Goldberg and McCann.
        Thus, Harold Pinter in his play “The Birthday Party”, portray the very effective and deeply rooted scenes which have seep meaning g to understand about politics, life and own structure of society. And the climax scene can be considered one of the best scenes in the whole play. As Harold Pinter was highly criticizing the treatment of some big nation like America, who somewhere highly active in creating mess between small counties, he gave an indication towards his this play.

       
       



                

Wednesday 22 October 2014

Kanthapura: Legendary History

Kanthapura: As A Legendary History


Introduction of Raja Rao:
    A Kannada novelist who had wrote many things about India is none another than Raja Rao. Raja Rao was born on 8th of November, 1908. His birth place was Hassan, in the state of Mysore (presently Karnataka) in South India. H was born in well-known Brahmin family. He was the eldest child among all the nine children. His mother tongue was Kannada. He has completed his post-graduate education in France, but the form of all his books publication was in English. His father was teaching Kannada at Nizam College. His mother was died when he was just four year old. He was educated at Muslim Schools named Madarsa-e-Aliya. It was situated in Hyderabad. He also took his education at the Aligarh Muslim University. He graduated from the University of Madras. He also won the Asiatic Scholarship of the Government of Hyderabad in 1929, for study in abroad.Raja Rao moved to the University of Montpellier located at France. He was teaching French language and literature at there. He explored the Indian effects on the Irish literature. He married Camille Mouly in 1931.She was her first wife. She was teaching French at Montpellier. The marriage was couldn’t breathe more and it lasted in very short time of nine years in 1939. He also worked as a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin from 1966 to 1983. Nobel laureate Czeslaw Milosz, was a friend of Rao, published his only a poem in the English language, "To Raja Rao".  After having a conversation with him.
He was an Indian writer of English language novels, short story and essays. His novels are still esteemed because of the realistic presentation of the past. Kanthapura was his first novel. The novels in which we can see his magnificent works were Kanthapura (1938) and The Serpent and the Rope (1960). The Serpent and the Rope was a semi-autobiographical novel. In this novel he wrote about his breakdown of their marriage. It was based on spiritual truth in India and Europe, which made him as one of the finest Indian Stylist novelist and won him the “Sahitya Akademi Award” in 1964. He published Gandhi’s biography “great Indian Way: A Life of Mahatma Gandhi”. For this he was awarded the “Neustadt International Prize for Literature” in 1988. He also honoured with “Padma Bhushan” in 1969 and with the “Padma Vibhushan” in 2007. He married Katherine Jones in 1965. She was an American stage actress. They have a son named Christopher Rama. They divorced in 1986. After that he married his third wife. Her name was Susan, whom he met when she was a student at the University of Texas in 1970s. Raja Rao died at the age of 97 on 8th of July at Austin in Texas.
Kanthapura as a Novel:
    “Kanthapura” is the first Indian novel written in English. It was one of the finest novels that appear in mid-twentieth century India. It is also one of the finest depictions of the Freedom Movement commenced in the early twentieth century by Mahatma Gandhi to lead India towards freedom from the colonial British rule. We can say that it is a traditional novel but we can also add that it follows the oral tradition of Indian legendary history. In that time majority of people in India lived their life under the British rule. The British ruler used to harm our ideas and ideals of Indian Nationalism. It is the story about Gandhi’s struggle for independence from the British ruler. So they came to the village called Kanthapura, in south India. Kanthapura is realistic and impartial presentation of the impact of Gandhian movement. Gandhi’s philosophy of life and political struggle is found in some characters of “Kanthapura”.
Kanthapura as a village:
   Kanthapura is a small village. It is a social document about a village in turmoil and the people living in it. This village is a microcosm of the traditional Indian society with its entrenched caste hierarchy. It located at the Western Ghats of “Himvathi” river in South India. Kanthapura played a vital role in the novel “Kanthapura”. Raja Rao shows traditional society and rural culture of India. There were two types of Brahmin Quarters. First one is Sudra quarter and second one is Pariah quarters. There were many sub casts but still all the villagers share their feelings with each other. That shows the tradition of Indian culture. People of Kanthapura still have that spark for life and they believed in togetherness. Kanthapura was not financially rich and civilized but people still connected with ceremonies, rituals and festivals with each other. They celebrate all the festivals like Ganesh-Chaturthi, Dashehara, Kartik Purnima together. That shows their unity and love for each other. Religion, imparted through discourses and prayer, keep alive in the native a sense of the presence of god.
It was narrated by Achakka. She was an old village woman lived in Kanthapura. In the first paragraph Achakka informs us of Kanthapura geographical location:
Our village – I don’t think you have ever heard
About it – Kanthapura is its name, and it is in the
Province of Kara.
High on the Ghats is it, high up the steep mountains
That face the cool Arabian seas, up the Malabar coast
Is it, up Manglore and Puttur and many a centre of
Cardamom and coffee, rice and sugarcane.
Roads, narrow, dusty, rut-covered roads, wind through the
Forest of teak and of jack, of sndal and of sal, and
Hanging over bellowing gorges and leaping over
Elephant-haunted valleys, they turn now to the left
And now to the right and being you through the
Alambi and Champa and Mena and Kola passes into,
The great granaries of trade. There, on the blue waters.
They say, our cartd cardamoms and coffee get into
The ships the Red-men bring, and, so they say, they
Go across the seven oceans into the countries where
Our rulers live.
   The story took place less than two years earlier, and all the memory was quite fresh in the mind of the grandmother. She and her female audience whom she addresses as “sisters” had survived the turbulence of social and political change. She creates her faithful image of an Indian way of life, circumscribed by tradition and indebted to its deities, of whom Kenchamma. She was the great and bounteous goddess.The grandmother recites distinctive sthala-purana about the goddess: “She called a demon ages, ages, ago, ademon that had come to ask our young women as wives. Keuchamma came from the heavens… and she waged such a battle and she fought so many a night that the blood soaked into the earth, and that is why the Kenchamma. Hill is all red. If not, tell me, sister, why should it be red only from the Tippur stream upwards, for a foot down on the other side of the stream you have mud, black and brown, but never red? Tell me, how could this happen, if it were not for Kenchamma and her battle? Thank heaven, not only did she slays the demon, but she even settled down among us, and this much I shall say, never has she failed us in our grief”.
 The novel “Kanthapura” takes us to the world of history of Hindu. We also experienced the Hindu epics and also come across the Hindu thoughts. The novel has also developed its mythic and symbolic framework. We find some elements whish shows the message of Nationalism that were ancient history, religion, characters from the epics, natural landscape and simple life of the village community of Kanthapura. Hari-Kathas was practiced by the villagers. As it is a traditional form of storytelling. Hari-Kathas are the story of God. Jayramchar was Hari-Katha man who narrated Hari-Katha based on Gandhi and his ideals. Afterwards he was arrested because of the political propaganda installed in the story.
   The leading character of the novel was “Moorthy”. He was the protagonist of the novel. He was a young guy with full of enthusiasm. He was also a well educated city boy. He discovered a half buried “Linga” from the village and installed it. After that a temple was built at there in the village and it became the centre point of the villagers. They used to celebrate all the ceremonies at there in the village. When he first time meet Mahatma Gandhi, he was very much impressed with him. So Moorthy decided to take a decision for his village. So he decides to bring his inactive village to the centrestage of national politics. When he returns to the village, he tried to put on Gandhian philosophies in the village. He tried to make them true satyagrahis. The novel is very much focused on Moorthy.
   One another leading character of novel is Rangamma. She was also one of the strongest women characters of the novel. She is a widow. And she has not any child. Her parents live with her. They were the necessary part of village Kanthapura. Rangamma was the first choice for the women member when Moorthy takes the step to make Congress Committee in Kanthapura.  She was backbone for Moorthy. She gives her house to use as Congress office. She was very much connected with Moorthy.
   Bhatta is also one other character of the novel Kanthapura. He is very sharp and judicious. He divides Moorthy in two different camps. One is Moorthy Camp and second one is Anti Moorthy Camp. Bade Khan was a police officer. He was Non Hindu of Kanthapura. He was brought and supported by the coffee planters. They were English men. Bade Khan was an enemy of the people of Kanthapura, as he supports the outsiders like English Men. Ratna’s character is related to Rangamma. She is a child widow. She was very strong and brave girl in very beginning but in absence of Moorthy and Rangamma she became a very good leader. Later she joined the main stream politics.
    Moorthy started living with Rangamma after the death of his mother. Moorthy was invited by Brahmin clerks at Skeffington. It was for to create awareness among all the coolies of the estate. When Moorthy was in the way for Kanthapura, Bade Khan hit him then Pariah coolies were stood with Moorthy. Though he was able to follow Gandhian Non Violance Principle, but this incident made him sad and he was unhappy after this. All the villagers were afraid after forced by British ruler to change their side and the government of British Ruler provoke them to inflict violent. And they arrested Moorthy. So Rangamma was decided to go for bail but they refused to do so. They punished Moorthy for three months strict imprisonment. Moorthy was facing very tough time in the prison. But the women of Kanthapura decided to fight for the freedom. So they create their own group. They named it Women’s Volunteer Corps. The leader of the group was Rangamma. In leadership of Rangamma, all the women of village had also started fight against cruel British ruler. She motivates all the women by telling the story of historical characters like Rani Laxmi Bai, Sarojini Naidu and many more. And there for Moorthy came out from the prison and he became stronger than before. And then he again started working for freedom. Threw his committee he was spreading the message of non-violence. He had worked hard for to get freedom from them.   
                In Kanthapura, we find the rural Indian culture. Moorthy was Raja Rao had define it very well threw out the novel. He didn’t define India through the geographical and tropical landmarks that are in India or the kings who were ruling India since long time. He says that they all are Indian and they essentially share the vision called India. Raja Rao was in against of comparing western history with the puranic history. Kanthapura was the imaginary novel of Raja Rao. There was no actual presence of Gandhi but his thought was alive in the characters whom they following very deeply. All the thoughts of freedom and better life were truly effects on the mind of the villagers.
“Who was this Gandhiji” Narsa asked Achakka this in Kanthapura. And he got reply “An old man- a bewitching man, a saint you know...! He looks beautiful as morning sun and he wers only a loincloth like a pariah ... He is a great man. They say he is an incarnation of God, and that is why everybody touches his feet even Brahmins my Son”. The novel records the Gandhian impact on a typical Indian villege through an informal but very intimate narration of an elderly widow,Achakka. Gandhi’s character was portrayed as a hero’s like Ram, Krishna, Shiva in the novel “Kanthapura”. The novel defines Gandhi as a divine reincarnation of Shiva. Kanthapura emerges to be a laboratory of the Gandhian thought and theory. The novel is a veritable grammar of the Gandhian myth. In Kanthapura, religion, an integral part of culture has been used for a secular and political purpose such as attaining Independence. Here religion has got a very significant role to play in defining the identity of people and also of the nation. The novel has a latent pattern to the treatment of castes and communities of Kanthapura. The congress workers, who were so passionate about ‘swadeshi’ and give up anything foreign, and they humiliate the European model of nation. This idea requires a nation state to have a singular form. A nation is a community of people who have a common language etc. Thus in Kanthapura, Congressmen including Moorthy follow the same model of the nation-state. Sankaru epitomises this: his insistence on speaking Hindi even to his mother instead of the local language Kannada; his fanatic resistance to the use of English and so on. This conception of the nation informs that of everyone: e.g. the narrator visualises Moorthy {when in prison} to be wearing kurta pyjama instead of dhoti. The Hindi teacher is not from any Hindi speaking region but a Malayali [Surya Menon]. Thus, the very conception of ‘Nation’, which is conceived after the European model of the nation-state, undermines the ‘Swadeshi’ spirit of nationalism. Any pure form of nationhood untouched by colonialism is seriously questioned.
Conclusion:
Raja Rao doesn’t miss the rhythm of “Indianness’ throughout the novel. In whole novel we find everything related to India and people of India. Raja Rao had included all the elements of Indian and Western spirit. So the novel had proved Raja Rao an extra ordinary novelist. Kanthapura is a documentization of philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi and the theory of Hinduism, the spirit of nationalism and an acknowledgement of common people in India. The structure of the novel also put a lime light on the women and Dalits and how they were treated in the society and how because of the British rule they enjoyed certain privileges which were otherwise next to impossible. A quote by C. Kodhndaraman
The British rile in India gave dalits and women an opportunity to display their anger and power which in a subtle way foretells that they are capable of fighting any type of oppression. They can both be admired and feared: admired for their role in the freedom struggle and feared for the potential they represent which can subvert and transform the status.”
Reflect the elements of Humanism and Feminism in the novel Kanthapura. Meenakshi Mukherjee says about the Kanthapura is on feminism “Making this old woman the narrator enables Raja Rao to mingle facts and myths and in an effective manner. For the old woman, Jawaharlal is a Bhratha to the Mahatma who she believes will slay Ravana so that Sita may be freed. For her Gandhi has attained the status of god and Moorthy is regarded Avatar in Kanthapura. The characteristically concrete imagination of the uneducated mind pictures the Mahatma as large and blue like the Sahydan mountain on whose slops the pilgrims climb to the top, while Moorthy is seen as a small mountain. To her the Satyagraha becomes a religious ceremony to which she devotes her sacred ardour.” And we can see this threw the character like Rangamma, Ratna and Moorthy.
Raja Rao had played the role of social critic in the novel and he was constantly in talk with his readers, which proved the quality of his writing skill and his mentality. He shows the glory of India threw the mother tongue of India like Hindi and Sanskrit. He had created a microcosm of fiction. Kanthapura shows the mirror image of the contemporary Indian society. In the beginning of the novel, the concept of freedom and nationalism is alien to the villagers. Alans Kohn said about nationalism: “Nationalism in India is not as a vehicle of individual liberty but as adoration of collective power.” The element of spirituality is brought through the use of myths and legend. It is the work of social realism. The life here is symbolic.
In Kanthapura Moorthy’s character is reflects the character of Gandhiji and Gandhiji was compared with the figure of god Rama. R. s. Singh had said upon this: “It may be clarified at outset that Kanthapura, is not an allegory because the comparision between Gandhi-British rule and Ramam-Ravana situation is not collaborate and complete. It is only a convenient comparison. A villager born and brought up in Indian Tradition understands easily a contemporary problem if it is explained through the widely-known fables, legends and religious stories of god, demons and superman The stories of Ramayana are repeated in our village. Therefore, it is but natural that a novel dealing with political awareness takes into consideration the rural vocabulary and obsessive images.” Thus the novel ends as it is the end of “Kalyuga with the Pralay”. All the villagers left the Kanthapura and settle in Kashipura. It also indicates about civilization and modernism to the India. Raja Rao had written a marvelous story on freedom for the history of Indian writing. Kanthapura also came out as a symbol of our glorious literature. We can say that it is an historical navel by Raja Rao.